Effect of Psychological Factors on EFL Teachers’ Attitude about Technology Use: Perceived ease of use, trialability, and subjective norms in focus
DOR: 20.1001.1.23223898.2021.9.37.5.3
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Somaye Davoodi
1
(Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
Leila Akbarpour
2
(Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
Ehsan Hadopour
3
(Department of English Language, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
کلید واژه: Attitude, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, subjective norm, trialability,
چکیده مقاله :
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of psychological factors on teachers` attitudes regarding technology use. To this purpose, such factors as ‘perceived usefulness’, ‘perceived ease of use’, ‘trialability’, ‘subjective norms’, and ‘attitude’ were investigated. The participants of the study were high school English language teachers in Shiraz, who were selected through stratified sampling as a representative sample of the available population. In order to assess the extent of the effect of each factor, five questionnaires were administered. Then, the elicited data were analyzed by means of path analysis. The obtained results revealed that ‘perceived ease of use’ was affected by ‘subjective norms’, and ‘trialability’ influenced the attitude of teachers about using technology in their teachings. The results also showed that the most influential factor on attitude was ‘trialability’. Furthermore, the results displayed that ‘perceived usefulness’ had a significant effect and subjective norms had an indirect but meaningful effect on the teachers’ attitude. The findings of the study have implications for school administrators and teachers to use them in their planning and instruction and, as a result, boost the learning environment.
kk
Adam, L., & Wood, F. (1999). An investigation of the impact of information and communication technologies in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of information Science, 25(4), 307-318.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers' Attitudes and Levels of Technology Use in Classrooms: The Case of Jordan Schools. International education studies, 3(2), 211-218.
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398.
Anni, C. T. (2018). School Counselors' Intention to Use Technology: The Technology Acceptance Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 120-124.
Arpaci, I. (2016). Understanding and predicting students' intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 150-157.
Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R., & Valcke, M. (2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 67, 21-35.
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: routledge.
Dastorani, M., & Khoshneshin, Z. (2017). An analytic review on the factors that affect Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Iranian universities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 8(2).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Delice, M. (2009). Explanation of police officers' information technology acceptance using the technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory: University of Louisville.
Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease‐of‐use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision sciences, 29(4), 839-869.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7): Pearson Upper Saddle River. In: NJ.
Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T., Mutahar, A., & Alrajawy, I. (2016). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Compatibility, and Net Benefits: an empirical study of internet usage among employees in Yemen. Paper presented at the The 7th International Conference Postgraduate Education (ICPE7).
Jung, H.-J. (2015). Fostering an English teaching environment: Factors influencing English as a foreign language teachers' adoption of mobile learning. Informatics in Education-An International Journal, 14(2), 219-241.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lee, Y.-H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Hsu, C.-N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees' intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124-137.
Liu, J. (2009). A survey of EFL learners' attitudes toward information and communication technologies. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 101-106.
Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Regstad, N. G. (1996). Using subjective norms to predict teachers' computer use. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(1), 27-33.
Mutahar, A. M., Daud, N. M., Ramayah, T., Isaac, O., & Alrajawy, I. (2017). Integration of innovation diffusion theory (IDT) and technology acceptance model (TAM) to understand mobile banking acceptance in Yemen: the moderating effect of income. International journal of soft computing, 12(3), 164-177.
Ntemana, T. J., & Olatokun, W. (2012). Analyzing the influence of diffusion of innovation attributes on lecturers’ attitude towards information and communication technologies. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
Rabaa'i, A. A. (2016). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to assess students' behavioural intentions to adopt an e-learning system: The case of moodle as a learning tool. Journal of emerging trends in engineering and applied sciences, 7(1), 13-30.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.
Shiau, S. J., Huang, C.-Y., Yang, C.-L., & Juang, J.-N. (2018). A derivation of factors influencing the innovation diffusion of the OpenStreetMap in STEM education. Sustainability, 10(10), 3447.
Smith, J. (2006). The effect of social presence on teacher technology acceptance, continuance intention, and performance in an online teacher professional development course.
Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision sciences, 25(5‐6), 863-874.
Tran, T. C. T., & Cheng, M. S. (2017). Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to Technology Acceptance Model: Understanding Consumers' Intention to Use Biofuels in Viet Nam. International review of management and business research, 6(2), 595.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342-365.
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15-35.
Yunus, M. (2014). Diffusion of innovation, consumer attitudes and intentions to use mobile banking. Paper presented at the Information and knowledge management.
Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2008). IDT-TAM integrated model for IT adoption. Tsinghua science and technology, 13(3), 306-311.
