Motivational English Language Learning Strategies Through Computers Among EFL Learners
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
1 - Assistant Professor, Shahreza branch, Islamic Azad University
کلید واژه: computer, Strategies, motivations, and learning,
چکیده مقاله :
The aim of this study was to describe and find out motivational English language learning strategies through computers among Iranian EFL learners and find out how learners’ motivations change towards English language learning through computers.The mixed method approach (quantitative and qualitative) was employed in this study. A total of 84 (out of 130) female freshman university learners from a university in Isfahan were randomly selected to fill out the questionnaire reflecting their motivational English language learning strategies through computers.They were aged between 18 and 20 years old and were native speakers of Persian. They were all in intermediate level based on their English proficiency levels. Also, a group of 6 out of these 84 learners were purposefully selected for the semi-structured interview in order to get more in-depth information. The descriptive analysis revealed that the learners all used high level of motivational strategies while learning English as a foreign language. It also demonstrated that the learners' motivational strategies related to the use of learners' general feelings towards computers were more frequently identified. The findings of the interviews also revealed that the use of computers motivate and stimulate learners to learn their courses as well as to communicate with one another more effectively. The implication of this study is to use computers as a teaching tool in classes and the learning motivational strategies through computers should be utilized in learning environments
Ahmad K., Corbett G., Rogers M. & Sussex R. (1985) Computers, language learning and language teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Babaee, N. (2012). Motivation in Learning English as a Second Language: A Literature Review. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 4 (1), 1-7.
Barson, J., Frommer, J., & Schwartz, M. (1993). Foreign language learning using e-mail in a task-oriented Perspective: Interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 565-584.
Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crooks, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512.
De Groot, E. V. (2002). Learning through interviewing: students and teachers talk about learning and Schooling. Educational Psychologist, 37(1): 41-52.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
Gardner, R.C., (2006). The socio-educational model of second language acquisition: A research paradigm.EUROSLA Yearbook, 6: 237-260. DOI: 10.1075/eurosla.6.14gar
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719-740.
Genç, G &Aydın, S. (2010). Students' motivation towards computer use in EFL learning.IETC, April 26-28, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hanson-Smith, E. (1997). Technology in the classroom: Practice and promise in the Papers, 2 Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of the Other Languages
Jayachandran, J. (2007). Computer assisted language learning (Call) as a method to develop study skills in students of engineering and technology at the tertiary level The Indian Review of World Literature in English, Vol. 3, No. II – July,
Jones C. &Fortescue S. (1987) Using computers in the language classroom, Harlow: Longman
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, K. W (2000).English teachers’ barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, VI (12), 1-8. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/
http://iteslj.org / Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html
Meihami, H, &Varmaghani, Z. (2013).The Effect of Integrating Computer-Assisted Language Learning Materials in L2 Reading Comprehension Classroom. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 9.49-58.
Melendy, G. A. (2008). Motivating writers: The power of choice. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 187-198.
Phillips, M. (1987). Communicative language teaching and the microcomputer. London: The British Council.
Soh, B. L., & Soon, Y. P. (1991). English by e-mail: creating a global classroom via the medium of computer technology. ELT Journal, 45, 287-292.
Tyson, R. E. (1994). Motivation and Computer-assisted language learning, Research Institute on East-West Cultures (μ¿¼ ¹®È ¿±), 2, 137-146, Hong Ik University, Seoul.
Vaezi, Z. (2008). Language learning motivation among Iranian undergraduate students, World Applied Sciences Journal, 5(1), 54-61.
Vilmi, R. (1995). HUT e-mail writing project: An ongoing experiment. In T. Orr (Ed.), English for science and technology: Profiles and perspectives (pp. 47-59). Aizuwakamatsu, Japan: University of Aizu, Center for Language Research.
Warschauer, M. (1996).Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, National Foreign Language Resource Center, NFLRC Net Work # 1, 1-17
Warschauer& Healey (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31, 57-71.
Wilkenson, T. W., & Sherman, T. M. (1996). Telecommunications-based distance education: Who's doing what? Educational Technology, 21 (11), 54-59.
