The Effects of Explicit vs. Implicit Instruction on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Acquisition of English Definite and Indefinite Articles
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Nasser Khodaeian
1
(English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
Ehsan Rezvani
2
(English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
Ahmadreza Lotfi
3
(English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
کلید واژه: Textual input enhancement, explicit instruction, implicit instruction, definite articles, indefinite articles,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study aims at investigating the differential effects of two types of instruction (explicit versus implicit) on the learning of English articles by Iranian EFL learners. To achieve this aim, 90 intermediate undergraduate students at Islamic Azad University, Shahreza Branch, whose major was English Translation were selected for the experiment. Then, they were divided into three groups namely, explicit group (EG), implicit group (IG), and control group (CG). The EG received instruction on English articles through two popular grammar books-- namely ‘Essential Grammar in Use’ by Murphy (1998) and ‘Oxford Practice Grammar’ by Eastwood (1999). The second group received instruction on English articles by employing the technique of textual input enhancement. The third group received similar instruction like IG except that English articles were not enhanced for this group. After analyzing the data on pre- and posttests, the results showed that the three groups of EG, IG, and CG improved significantly from pretest to posttests. Moreover, on the posttest, the EG learners significantly outweighed the IG learners, who were in turn found to be significantly better than their counterparts in the CG. The results of this study have several important implications for the classroom practice concerning the controversial issue of teaching English articles.
l
Afitska, O. (2012). Role of focus-on-form instruction, corrective feedback and uptake in second language classrooms: some insights from recent second language acquisition research. The Language Learning Journal, pp.1-17.
Al-Hejin, B. (2009). Attention and awareness: Evidence from cognitive and second language acquisition research. Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Lingustics,4 (1), 1-22.
Berent, G. P., Kelly, R. R., Aldersley, S., Schmitz, K. L., Khalsa, B. K., Panara, J., & Keenan, S. (2007). Focus-on-form instructional methods promote deaf college students' improvement in English grammar. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, (12), 8-24.
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of Language. Ann Arbor. MI: Karoma Publishers
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
Brown, H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd Edition). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education Company.
Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 179-193.
Celce-Murcia M and Larsen-Freeman D (1999) The grammar book: An ESL teacher’s course. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1997) Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in Communicative Language Teaching? TESOL Quarterly, 31, 141-152
Chalipa, S. (2013). The effect of inductive vs. deductive instructional approach in grammar learning of ESL learners. Retrieved from deccanjournal.net/Pub paper/Vol-Iss-2013-9.pdf.
Cross, D. (1991). A Practical handbook of language teaching. London: Cassell.
DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning L2 grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (p. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Eastwood, J. (1999). Oxford practice grammar with answers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, N. (1994). Vocabulary acquisition: The implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mediation. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 211-282). London: Academic Press.
Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 39-60.
Ellis, R. (2002) “Grammar Teaching-Practice or consciousness-raising?” In Richard, J.C. and Renandy, W. A. (eds) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice Cambridge: CUP
Ellis, R. (2008). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky, & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 437-455). Oxford: Blackwell.
Erlam, R. (2003) Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning studies in second language acquisition, 25,559-582
Galotti, K., Komatsou, L., & Voelz, S. (1997). Children’s differential performance on deductive and inductive syllogisms. Developmental Psychology, 33, 70-78.
Gass, S., K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Magnan, & J. Walz, eds. (2002). Pedagogical norms for second and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goodman, K. (1987). Determiners in Reading: Miscues on a few little words. Language and Education, 1(l), 33-58.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL reading vocabulary. Reading in Foreign Language, 17 (1), 23-59.
Izumi, S. (2012). Focus on form in second language acquisition. Trans. Gang-goo Yoon Seoul: In Noon Sa Print.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of English language. London: Longman Press.
Leow, R. P. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 151-182.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia, (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Lynch, T. (2009). Responding to learners’ perceptions of feedback: The use of comparators in second language speaking courses. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 191-203.
Macaro, E. & L. Masterman. (2006). Does intensive explicit grammar instruction make all the difference? Language Teaching Research, 10, 297-327.
Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25, 215-232.
Master, P. (2002). Information structure and English article pedagogy. System, 30,331-348.
McEldowney, P.L. (1977). A teaching grammar of the English article system. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 95-112.
Mitchell, R. & F. Myles (2004). Second language learning theories. Arnold Publishers: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, B. (1998). Essential grammar in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nassaji, H. (2000). Towards integrating form-focused instruction and communicative interaction in the second language classroom: Some pedagogical possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 241-50
Nassaji, H. & M. Swain (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34-51.
Nassaji, H. & S. Fotos (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 126-145.
Norris, J., & Ortega L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.
Norrish, J. M. & L. Ortega (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
Poole, A. (2005). Focus on form instruction: Foundations, applications, and criticisms. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 47-56.
Poole, A. (2005). The kinds of forms learners attend to during focus on form instruction: A description of an advanced ESL writing class. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), 58-92.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Longman.
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning,45(2), 283-331.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. Em Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 206-226.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. J. Robinson (Ed.). Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal, 49, 113-142.
Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395-403.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159-68
Sharwood- Smith, M. (1994). Second language learning: Theoretical foundations. London: Longman.
Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (1989). Canadian immersion and adult second language teaching: what's the connection? The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 150-159.
Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring taskeffects. Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, 99- 118.
Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China: Progress and resistance. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194-198.
VanPatten, B. & T. Cadierno (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood: Ablex.
Zhisheng, W. (2008). Is noticing vital for L2 learners? A critical review of Schmidt's noticing hypothesis. CELEA Journal, 31(3), 3-11.
