A Novel Multi-Functional Capacitive Fault Current Limiter to Enhance LVRT Capability of Wind Farm
محورهای موضوعی : Electrical EngineeringMohsen Ghorbani 1 , Babak Mozafari 2 , Mehdi Firouzi 3 , Farzad Golshan 4
1 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Abhar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abhar, Iran
4 - Department of Electrical Engineering, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
کلید واژه: Wind farm, Capacitive Fault Current Limiter, LVRT,
چکیده مقاله :
In this study a new type of fault current limiter is introduced. It has been named multi-functional capacitive fault current limiter (MCFCL). as a variable capacitor, its function is to control active power flow in normal conditions as well as improving the capability of low voltage rid-through (LVRT) in fault operating conditions. The new structure has been proposed based on the capacitive bridge-type fault current limiter (BFCL) and the RL-type fault current limiter (FCL), which is modified to enhance low-voltage ride-through capability. To assess the efficacy of proposed fault current limiter, the time domain simulations were executed in PSCAD/EMTDC software and its function is compared with the RL-type SSFCLs in normal and symmetrical or asymmetrical fault conditions. Also its efficacy has been evaluated in a fixed speed based wind farm. The result of simulations showed that the MCFCL is not only able to control the power flow in normal operating condition, but also improves the LVRT performance in fault operating condition in the wind farms.
[1] Y. Li, L. Fan, Zh. Miao , “ Replicating Real-World Wind Farm SSR Events” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,2019,35(1), pp. 339 – 348,
[2] B. Rona and O. Guler, “Power system integration of wind farms and analysis of grid code requirements,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2015, 49, pp. 100–107
[3] M. Tsili and S. Papathanassiou, “A review of grid code technical requirements for wind farms,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 308–332, Sep. 2009. DOI: 10. 1049/iet-rpg.2008.0070.
[4] J. Pedra, F. C orcoles, L. Monjo, S. Bogarra, and and A. Rolan, “On fixed-speed WT generator modeling for rotor speed stability studies,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 397–406, Apr 2012. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011. 2161779
[5] A. Jalilian, S. B. Naderi, M. Negnevitsky, M. TarafdarHagh and K. M. Muttaqi, “Controllable DC-link fault current limiter augmentation with DC chopper to improve fault ride-through of DFIG,” IET Renewable Power Generation,
vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 313–324, Feb. 2017. DOI: 10.1049/ietrpg.2016.0146.
[6] A. Jalilian, M. TarafdarHagh, M. Abapour and K. M. Muttaqi, “DC-link fault current limiter-based fault ridethrough scheme for inverter-based distributed generation,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 690–699, 2015. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0289.
[7] M. Firouzi and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Improving fault ridethrough capability of fixed-speed wind turbine by using bridge-type fault current limiter,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2013, 28(2), pp. 361–369
[8] G. Rashid and M. H. Ali, “A modified bridge-type fault current limiter for fault ride-through capacity enhancement of fixed speed wind generator,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2014, 29(2), pp. 527–534
[9] M. Firouzi and G. B. Gharehpetian, “LVRT performance enhancement of DFIG-based wind farms by capacitive bridge-type fault current limiter,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy.2018, 9(3), pp. 1118–1125.
[10] M. Firouzi, G. Gharehpetian, B, Mozafari.: ‘Bridge-type superconducting fault current limiter effect on distance relay characteristics’, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2015, 68, pp. 115-122
[11] T. Ise, NH. Nguyen, S. Kumagai.: ‘Reduction of inductance and current rating of the coil and enhancement of fault current limiting capability of a rectifier type superconducting fault current limiter’, IEEE Trans ApplSupercond 2001, 11(1), pp. 1932 – 1935