A Multicultural Study: Input Enhancement and Jigsaw Impacts on Reading Comprehension of Immigrant ESL Learners in Iran
الموضوعات : نشریه مطالعات آموزش زبان انگلیسی
Masuma Alavikhah
1
,
Seyed Abdolmajid Tabatabaee Lotfi
2
,
Amir Sarkeshikian
3
1 - English Language Department,Qom Branch,Islamic Azad University,Qom,Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: input enhancement, focused instruction, meaning-focused instruction, reading comprehension.,
ملخص المقالة :
Focused instructions in language teaching have gained weight during recent decades. As reading is a powerful tool for vocabulary growth, knowing which instructions have more effect on it is necessary. The effectiveness of focused instructions has been examined in empirical studies. But few inquiries compared the impacts of form-focused instruction like input enhancement with meaning-focused instruction such as Jigsaw on L2 development. Therefore, this research tried to examine a comparison between the impacts of input enhancement and jigsaw on reading comprehension of non-Iranian ESL learners.50 elementary ESL learners in an international primary school were chosen in three intact classes. In the first experimental group, input enhancement was used for presenting the target words; in the second experimental group, the jigsaw was used. The control group learned the same target words giving the participants a word list (traditional). Before applying the treatment all the subjects were given the teacher-made pretest. After five sessions of treatment, the post-test was administered. One-way ANOVAs were used to analyze the data collected from the learners’ performance on the pretest and post-test. The results announced that there was not any notable distinction between the post-test scores of the three groups. However, the paired samples t-test results revealed that the input enhancement and control group had reading comprehension development after the treatment. This research can inform teachers and syllabus designers about the efficiency of input enhancement and word lists on reading comprehension.
Adhami, M., Marzban, A., Garmsar, I., & Qaemshahr, I. (2014). The effect of jigsaw task on reading ability of Iranian intermediate high school EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 4(2), 13-24.
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1982). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report; no. 249.
Arai, Y., & Takizawa, K. (2024). Text and reading task variables in incidental L2 vocabulary learning from reading: A methodological synthesis. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 100110.
Benati, A. (2021). Beyond methods: Towards an evidence-based approach to language instruction. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 1-11.
Bossers, B. H. (1992). Reading in two languages: A study of reading comprehension in Dutch as a second language and in Turkish as a first language. Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam.
Chung, Y., & Révész, A. (2024). Investigating the effect of textual enhancement in post-reading tasks on grammatical development by child language learners. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 632-653.
Coelho, E. (1992). Jigsaw: Integrating language and content. Cooperative language learning, 129-152.
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching the effects of form-focussed instruction on L2 acquisition. AILA review, 19(1), 18-41.
Esnawy, S. (2016). EFL/EAP Reading and research essay writing Using Jigsaw. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 98-101.
Ghaith, G. (2004). Correlates of the implementation of the STAD cooperative learning method in the English as a foreign language classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 7(4), 279-294.
Gömleksiz, M. N. (2007). An evaluation of engineering students’ perceptions towards the English language teaching-learning environment at engineering faculties in Turkey: The case of Firat, Ataturk, Inonu, and Dicle Universities. Architecture, 304, 19-5.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2018). How reading comprehension works. In Teaching English to Second Language Learners in Academic Contexts (pp. 9-27). Routledge.
Hill, L. A. (1980). Steps to understanding. Oxford University Press.
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1-18.
Kazemi, M. (2012). The effect of Jigsaw technique on the learners’ reading achievement: The case of English as L2. The modern journal of applied linguistics, 5(3), 170-184.
Kim, Y. (2006). Effects of input elaboration on vocabulary acquisition through reading by Korean learners of English as a foreign language. Tesol Quarterly, 40(2), 341-373.
Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.
Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. Eurosla yearbook, 5(1), 223-250.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, 2(1), 39-52.
Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton, 179-192.
Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 576-592). Routledge.
Joshi, R. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209-219.
Marsden, E., Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). Second language learning theories. Routledge.
Masoudi, G. (2017). The effect of vocabulary self-selection strategy and input enhancement strategy on the vocabulary knowledge of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 10(8), 32-42.
Moradi, M., & Farvardin, M. T. (2016). A comparative study of effects of input-based, meaning-based output, and traditional instructions on EFL learners’ grammar learning. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 99-119.
Motlagh, S. F. P., & Nasab, M. S. B. (2015). Assessing input enhancement as a positive factor and its impact on L2 vocabulary learning. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 227-237.
Nahavandi, N., & Mukundan, J. (2014). The impact of textual input enhancement on Iranian elementary EFL learners' vocabulary intake. Asian Social Science, 10(21), 216.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in a communicative context. Routledge.
Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?. Canadian modern language review, 63(1), 59-82. Nation, P., & Meara, P. (2013). 3 Vocabulary. In An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 44-62). Routledge.
Nozohouri, R., Mahmoudi, F., Adhami, N., & Rasouli, S. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of the jigsaw 2 model and traditional learning on reading comprehension of Iranian learners. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 3(2), 71-79.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill.
Peters, E. (2012). Learning German formulaic sequences: The effect of two attention-drawing techniques. The Language Learning Journal, 40(1), 65-79.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rolheiser, C. A. R. O. L., & Stevahn, L. (1998). The role of staff developers in promoting effective teacher decision-making. Professional Development for Cooperative Learning Issues and Approaches, 63-78.
Sabbah, S. (2016). The effect of jigsaw strategy on ESL students’ reading achievement. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 7.
Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37, 124–135.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language teaching, 30(2), 73-87.
Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 Reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5(2), 57-93.
Toomer, M., Elgort, I., & Coxhead, A. (2024). Contextual learning of L2 lexical and grammatical collocations with and without typographic enhancement. System, 121, 103235.
Vu, D. V., & Peters, E. (2022). Learning vocabulary from reading-only, reading-while-listening, and reading with textual input enhancement: insights from Vietnamese EFL learners. RELC journal, 53(1), 85-100.
Wang, M., Alavi, M., & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The Impact of jigsaw cooperative learning on academic motivation, academic hardiness, and self-efficacy of English foreign language learners. Learning and Motivation, 84, 101940.
White, J. (1998). Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 85-113.
Williams, J. (2005). Form-focused instruction. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 695-716). Routledge.
Zuo, W. (2011). The effects of cooperative learning on improving college students’ reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1 (8), 986 - 989.
