مکان‌یابی اسکان اضطراری در منطقه 19 شهر تهران با استفاده از روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره
الموضوعات :
افراسیاب خیردست
1
(دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت محیط‌زیست، دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران)
سید علی جوزی
2
(استاد گروه محیط‌زیست، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.*(مسوول مکاتبات))
سحر رضایان
3
(گروه مهندسی محیط‌زیست، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران.)
مهناز میرزا ابراهیم طهرانی
4
(گروه مدیریت محیط‌زیست، دانشکده علوم و فنون دریایی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.)
الکلمات المفتاحية: مکان‌یابی, اسکان اضطراری, روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره, منطقه‌ی 19 شهر تهران.,
ملخص المقالة :
زمینه و هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه‌ی الگوی مناسب براي مكان‌يابي جهت اسكان اضطراری ناشی از بلایای طبیعی و غیرطبیعی در منطقه 19 تهران می‌باشد. روش بررسی: روش انجام پژوهش از نوع توصيفي– تحليلي بوده و تحليل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره و سامانه‌ی Arc GIS وExcel می‌باشد. جامعه آماري از بین متغيرهاي مكان‌يابي اسكان اضطراری انتخاب و روش نمونه‌گیری بصورت ساده و حجم نمونه‌گیری با استفاده از جدول مورگان (19=n) بدست آمد. ابزار پژوهش، پرسشنامه بود که به بصورت کمی طراحی و سوالات آن با استفاده از استانداردهای اسکان اضطراری استخراج و در بین خبرگان پخش شد. روایی پرسشنامه توسط متخصصین تایید شد و مقدار آن 421/0 بدست آمد. پایایی پرسشنامه نیز با استفاده از SPSS20 با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 827/0 محاسبه شد. یافته‌ها: یافته‌ای پژوهش حاضر از 3 معیار اصلی (مطلوبیت، سازگاری و ظرفیت) و 18 زیرمعیار جهت تعیین اسکان در نظر گرفته شد. در فرایند مکان‌یابی اسکان اضطراری، ابتدا لایه‌های اطلاعاتی تهیه و سپس استانداردسازی و ضرائب AHP به آنها اعمال شده و در نهایت پس از وزن‌دار کردن آنها، همپوشانی لایه‌ها انجام شد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: پس از تولید نهایی نقشه‌ی اسکان و طبق نتایج این پژوهش، 28 پهنه با ارزش 9_7 جهت اسکان مورد پذیرش واقع شد، همچنین 17 پهنه با ارزش 7 (نسبتا خوب)، 7 پهنه با ارزش 8 (خوب) و 4 پهنه با ارزش 9 (ایده‌آل) در منطقه مورد مطالعه جهت اسکان اضطراری شناسایی شدند. در مجموع 13218725 مترمربع حدودا معادل 1321 هکتار در منطقه 19 تهران قابلیت اسکان را پیدا کرد.
1. Zahraee Z, Fatemi A. Sustainable temporary shelter design via lightweight and recyclable materials. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2022; 12 (3) :300-323. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-527-fa.html. (In Persian)
2. Dehghan farouji F, Dehghan A. Disabled people and their vulnerability and challenges in disaster situation-case study: Study of Disability in Tehran City with emphasize on womans. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2021; 11 (1) :9-23. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-379-fa.html.(In Persian)
3. Hayatgheibi Z S, Ghalambordezfooly R. Apply Analysis Hierarchical Process for Site selection of Temporary Housing centers after Disaster (Case study: District 2 of Tehran City). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2021; 11 (4) :401-413. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-447-fa.html.-(In Persian)
4. Mottaki Z, Javidruzi M, Soltany Qalaty F. A planning framework for post-disaster collective shelters. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2020; 10 (3) :251-263. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-354-fa.html. (In Persian)
5. Jamali S, Shahbandarzadeh H, Ghorbanpour A. Application of a Hybrid Approach to Locating Emergency Accommodation Centers in Earthquake Crisis - A Case Study of Bushehr City. Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2021; 10 (4) :378-363. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-367-fa.html. (In Persian)
6. hassanpour Kazerouni N, Alavian S M, Tahmasebizadeh F. Analysis of Proportion and Prioritization of Public and Governmental Buildings for the Community Shelters in Eartquake Crisis Using GIS (Case Study: District 5 of Tehran City). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2020; 10 (1) :103-91. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-325-fa.html. (In Persian)
7. hassanpour Kazerouni N, Alavian S M, Tahmasebizadeh F. Analysis of Proportion and Prioritization of Public and Governmental Buildings for the Community Shelters in Eartquake Crisis Using GIS (Case Study: District 5 of Tehran City). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 2020; 10 (1) :103-91. URL: http://dpmk.ir/article-1-325-fa.html. (In Persian)
8. Izadi, M., Samouei, P. Locating Distribution Centers and Vehicle Routing in the disaster condition using two-stage programming. Emergency Management, 2021; 10(2): 131-140. (In Persian)
9. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Korzebor, M. R. Bi-objective mathematical modelling for a location-relocation problem of hierarchical healthcare facilities under uncertainty and disaster. Emergency Management, 2022; 11(1): 5-16. (In Persian)
10. Abolfazl Zolfaghari, Zahra Azizi , Hossin Aghamohammadi, Locating suitablesites for relief camps during severe floods using GIS (Case study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province), Iranian Journal of Eco Hydrology, 2021; 8(1): 127-142. magiran.com/p2243570. (In Persian)
11. Hosseinzadeh, Nemat, Astelazhi, Alireza, Daniyali, Tahmineh. Clarification of crisis management strategies in worn-out urban contexts (Case study: District 19 of Tehran Municipality). Scientific and Research Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 2019; 13(1): 114-133. (In Persian)
12. Moghimi S, Monsefi Parapari D. Site selection for Temporary Earthquake Shelter Compounds, Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Weighted Linear Combination based on GIS; Case Study: Shahrood. Journal title 2019; 6 (1) :71-94. URL: http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2865-fa.html. (In Persian)
13. seyedi, S., seyedi, S., amiri, M., taghavi fard, M. T. Establishing an emergency relief chain in a crisis with the approach of multiple transfer points and facilities location case study: south-central regions of Tehran. Emergency Management, 2020; 9(2): 19-31. (In Persian)
14. alikhani, A., barzegar, A., norllahi, H. Developing a New Model for Vulnerability Assessment of city zones with passive defense approach. Emergency Management, 2020; 8(2): 33-46. (In Persian)
15. rahmani, Z., Safaei, A. S., Paydar, M. M. A multi-objective optimization model for locating temporary treatment centers and logistic planning after a crisis. Emergency Management, 2019; 7(2): 19-33. (In Persian)
16. Khammar, G., Namazi, A. A. Locating Temporary Settlement Sites Using Fuller's Fuzzy Triangle Process in a Geographic Information System (GIS) (Case Study: The City of Chabahar). Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 2018; 15(2): 269-287. doi: 10.22067/geography.v15i2.44675.(-In Persian)
17. Yibing Yao, Yuyang Zhang, Taoyu Yao, Kapo Wong, Jin Yeu Tsou and Yuanzhi Zhang. (2021), A GIS-Based System for Spatial–Temporal Availability Evaluation of the Open Spaces Used as Emergency Shelters: The Case of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020063.
18. Hamideh Deloui1, Sanaz Saeidi Mofrad, Identification and evaluation of physical indicators affecting emergency accommodation and safe places with physical resilience approach Case study: District 11 of Mashhad, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020, 76-84.
19. Elnaz Asgari Namin, Ali Javan Forouzandeh, Maziyar Asefi and Kazem Shakeri. (2021), Explaining the Model of Post-Disaster Temporary Accommodation Strategy (Case Study: Sarpol-e Zahab, Kermanshah), Journal of Research and Rural Planning Volume 10, No. 3, Summer 2021, Serial No. 34, Pp. 39-60, eISSN: 2783-2007, ISSN: 2322-2514.
20. Didier Milindi Rugema, Tadesse Amsalu Birhanu, Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi. (2022), Analysing land policy processes with stages model: Land policy cases of Ethiopia and Rwanda, Accepted 5 April 2022, Available online 11 April 2022, Version of Record 11 April 2022. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106135.
21. M.S. Hossain, C.K. Gadagamma, Y. Bhattacharya, M. Numada, N. Morimura, K. Meguro. (2020), Integration of smart watch and Geographic Information System (GIS) to identify post-earthquake critical rescue area part. I. Development of the system, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100116. 2590-0617, Published by Elsevier Ltd
22. Kabir Uddin, Mir A. Matin, (2021). Potential flood hazard zonation and flood shelter suitability mapping for disaster risk mitigation in Bangladesh using geospatial technology, Progress in Disaster Science 11 (2021) 100185, doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100185.
23. Omidvar B, Khorram M. Optimization of the Construction System of Relief Tents Used in Emergency Accommodation. jorar 2022; 14 (3) :176-191.
24. Taghavifard M T, Yousefzadeh Y, Feizi K, Taghva M. Effective Components on Cash-based Intervention to Affected People by Natural Disasters Using Information and Communication Technology in Iran. jorar 2020; 12 (1) :57-66
25. https://region19.tehran.ir/
26. Richmond, Tom (2020), General Topology: An Introduction, De Gruyter, p. 32, ISBN 978-3-11-068657-9.
27. Maor, Eli (2019), The Pythagorean Theorem: A 4,000-Year History, Princeton University Press, pp. 133–134, ISBN:978-0-691-19688-6.
28. Ratcliffe, John G. (2019), Foundations of Hyperbolic Manifolds, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 149, Springer, p. 32, ISBN 978-3-030-31597-9.
29. Gonzalez-Hidalgo, Manuel; Munar, Marc; Bibiloni, Pedro; Moya-Alcover, Gabriel; Craus-Miguel, Andrea; Segura-Sampedro, Juan Jose (October 2019). "Detection of infected wounds in abdominal surgery images using fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets". 2019 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). Barcelona, Spain: IEEE: 99–106. doi:10.1109/WiMOB.2019.8923289. ISBN 978-1-7281-3316-4. S2CID 208880793.
30. Yanase, Juri; Triantaphyllou, Evangelos (2019). "The Seven Key Challenges for the Future of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medicine". International Journal of Medical Informatics. 129: 413–422. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.017. PMID 31445285. S2CID 198287435
31. Yanase, Juri; Triantaphyllou, Evangelos (2019). "A Systematic Survey of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Medicine: Past and Present Developments". Expert Systems with Applications. 138: 112821. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112821. S2CID 199019309.
32. Bansod, Nitin A; Kulkarni, Marshall; Patil, S.H. "Soft Computing- A Fuzzy Logic Approach". In Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering (ed.). Soft Computing. Allied Publishers. p. 73. ISBN: 978-81-7764-632-0. Retrieved 9 November 2018.
33. Kosko, Bart. "Fuzziness vs. Probability". University of South California. Retrieved 9 Novembe 2018
34. Høyrup, Jens (2018), "Mesopotamian mathematics", in Jones, Alexander; Taub, Liba (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 1: Ancient Science, Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–72.
35. "What is 'fuzzy logic'? Are there computers that are inherently fuzzy and do not apply the usual binary logic?". Scientific American. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
36. Alfakih, Abdo Y. (2018), Euclidean Distance Matrices and Their Applications in Rigidity Theory, Springer, p. 51, ISBN 978-3-319-97846-8.
37. dam, John A. (2017), "Chapter 2. Introduction to the "Physics" of Rays", Rays, Waves, and Scattering: Topics in Classical Mathematical Physics, Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics, Princeton University Press, pp. 26–27, doi:10.1515/9781400885404-004, ISBN 978-1-4008-8540-4
38. Liberti, Leo; Lavor, Carlile (2017), Euclidean Distance Geometry: An Introduction, Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics and Technology, Springer, p. xi, ISBN 978-3-319-60792-4.
39. Asli, Kaveh Hariri; Aliyev, Soltan Ali Ogli; Thomas, Sabu; Gopakumar, Deepu A. (2017-11-23). Handbook of Research for Fluid and Solid Mechanics: Theory, Simulation, and Experiment. CRC Press. ISBN:9781315341507.
