Comparative Effects of Technology-, Motivational-, and Metacognitive-based Scaffolding on Male and Female Iranian Adult Advanced EFL Learners’ Speaking
الموضوعات : Research in English Language PedagogySanaz Jafari 1 , Mohammad Reza Talebinejad 2 , Saeed Ketabi 3
1 - Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
2 - Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran|Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan
3 - Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran|Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan
الکلمات المفتاحية: EFL learners, Technology-based scaffolding, Metacognitive-based scaffolding, English speaking, Motivational-based scaffolding,
ملخص المقالة :
There is growing interest in integrating scaffolding in educational decisions everywhere including Iran. Drawing on sociocultural theory, this quasi-experimental study was aimed to determine the effect of technology-, motivational-, and metacognitive-based scaffolding on improving Iranian adult advanced EFL learners’ speaking. A sample of 90 advanced EFL learners was selected non-randomly based on their performance on Certificate in Advanced English (CAE) from two language institutes in Tehran, Iran during the summer and autumn semesters of 2019. The selected participants were randomly assigned to three equal groups. IELTS was used to compare their language proficiency at the beginning and the end of the study. Scaffolding provided conditions for learners to highly engage in speaking activities. The results of paired-sample t-tests revealed a significant improvement in the speaking scores of the three study groups. The results of the one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc tests indicated that motivational-based scaffolding was more conducive to enhance Iranian EFL learners’ speaking. The results of this study showed the positive impacts of integrating scaffolding into different language learning strategies, and this may carry pedagogical implications for both language teachers and learners.
Ahmad, N., Jumaat, N. F., Samah, N. A., Ashari, Z. M., Abdullah, A. H., & Ali, D. F. (2019). The effect of metacognitive scaffolding framework towards students’ performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6S5), 1584-1593.
Alias, N. A. (2012). Design of a motivational scaffold for the Malaysian e-learning environment. Educational Technology and Society, 15(1), 137-151.
Arfaei Zarandi, S. Z., & Rahbar, B. (2014). The impact of interactive scaffolding on Iranian EFL learners speaking ability. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(2), 344-353.
Behroozizad, S., Nambiar, R. & Amir, Z. (2014). Sociocultural theory as an approach to aid EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 217-226.
Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational psychologist, 48(4), 243-270.
Berenji, S., & Saeidi, M. (2017). Technology mediated instruction and its effect on cognitive scaffolding, motivation, and academic performance in EFL context. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 10(21), 72-96.
Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75-85.
Chen, C. (2014). An adaptive scaffolding e-learning system for middle school students’ physics learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 342-355.
Cheung, Y. L. (2018). The effects of writing instructors' motivational strategies on student motivation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(3), 55.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185.
Efklides, A. (2011). Interaction of metacognition with motivation and effect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.
Gagné, N., & Parks, S. (2013). Cooperative learning tasks in a Grade 6 intensive ESL class: Role of scaffolding. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 188-209.
Gertner, R. T. (2011). The Effects of Multimedia Technology on Learning. MS,Abilene Christian University. Retrieved from: http://www.acu.edu/technology/mobilelearning/documents/research/effects-of-technology-on-learning.pdf
Ginaya, G., Aryana, I. N. R., & Somawati, N. P. (2018). Improving students' speaking ability through scaffolding technique. SOSHUM: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora [Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities], 8(1), 72-85.
Guerrero, M. C. M., de & Commander, M. (2013). Shadow-reading: Affordances for imitation in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 433-453.
Hasan, M. (2018). Impact of motivational scaffolding on the acquisition of writing skills in L2 situation. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), 7(12),39-45.
Hogan, K. E., & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books.
Hsu, C. K., & Chang, C. K. (2010). Effects of automatic hidden caption classification on a content-based computer-assisted language learning system for foreign language listening. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Jumaat, N. F., & Tasir, Z. (2016). A framework of metacognitive scaffolding in learning authoring system through Facebook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), 619-659.
Jiang, Y., & Kleitman, S. (2015). Metacognition and motivation: Links between confidence, self-protection, and self-enhancement. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 222–230.
Leong, L. M, & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learner’s English-speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 1-34.
Myles, F. (2017). Learning foreign languages in primary schools: is younger better? Languages, Society & Policy, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9806
Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: a review. European Psychologist, 20, 190-203. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
Rahmah, F., & St Nurjannah, Y. T. (2016). The Use of Scaffolding Talk Technique to Improve the Second Grade Students Speaking Skill at Mts Madani Paopao Gowa. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 2(2), 252-268.
Raphael, L. M., Pressley, M., & Mohan, L. (2008). Engaging instruction in middle school classrooms: An observational study of nine teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 61-81.
Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5),40-55.
Rebolledo-Mendez, G., du Boulay, B., & Luckin, R. (2006). Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation. 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 545-554.
Sardegna, V. G. & McGregor, A. (2013). Scaffolding students’ self-regulated efforts for effective pronunciation practice. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, August. 2012. (pp. 182-193). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Tan, Y. H. & Tan, S. C. (2010). A metacognitive approach to enhancing Chinese language speaking skills with audioblogs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 1075-1089.
Thoman, D. B., Smith, J. L., Brown, E. R., Chase, J. P., Lee, J. K. (2013). Beyond performance: The motivational experience model of stereotype threat. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 211–243.
Tuckman, B. W. (2007). The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators’ distance learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 49(2), 414-422.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. The problems of general psychology. Including the volume thinking and speech. New York: Plenum.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
Yuanhua, C. H. E. N., & Guocai, Z. H. A. O. (2016). The Application of Scaffolding Theory into Oral English Teaching in Middle School. Studies in Literature and Language, 12(4), 63-66.