Leaf Chlorophyll Changes and Morphological Features of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Cultivars by P-Zn Ratios in Greenhouse Condition
الموضوعات :
Anise Jorfi
1
(Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.)
Mojtaba Alavifazel
2
(Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.)
Abdolali Gilani
3
(Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. |Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran.)
Mohammad Reza Ardakani
4
(Department of Agronomy, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.)
الکلمات المفتاحية: phosphorus, root density, Oil seed, <i>Correlation, Zinc</i>,
ملخص المقالة :
BACKGROUND: Sufficient nutrients supplying is one of the most important factors in realizing the crops potential performance and achieving high yield, which in conventional agriculture is provided by using chemical fertilizers. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the root and shoot structure of quinoa cultivars in response to the phosphorus and zinc sulfate fertilizers application in the Research, Agricultural Education and Natural Resources Center of Khuzestan province. METHODS: The statistical model was factorial based on completely randomized design (CRD) with three factors including the use of triple superphosphate fertilizer at four amounts (0, 6, 12, 18 mg. kg-1 soil weight), foliar application of zinc sulfate in three concentrations (water without zinc sulfate (control), foliar application at 4 and 8 g. L-1 concentrations) and three quinoa cultivars (Giza 1, Q26, Titicaca) in P.V.C pots and in three replications. RESULT: The simultaneous effect of experimental factors on chlorophyll index and shoot morphological traits was significant. Root length to shoot length ratio was affected by the main effect of P2O5 fertilizer and the cultivars differences, and the effect of zinc sulfate was not significant on this trait. In most of the analysed traits, the 4 g. L-1 concentration of zinc sulfate was more effective than the 8 g. L-1 concentration. The total grain weight of the three cultivars was affected by the amount of fertilizer, and the best values of this attribute belonged to the 18 mg. kg-1 triple superphosphate and 4 g. L-1 concentration of zinc sulfate in Q26 cultivar. This trait (TGW) showed the most positive correlation with the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem diameter, and chlorophyll index. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this experiment, the optimal application of P-Zn ratios by reducing the antagonism effects led to the root and shoot structure development, and increased quinoa cultivars production.
Afshari, M., A. Naderi, M. Mojadam, Sh. Lack. and M. Alavifazel. 2020. Zinc and iron-mediated alleviation water deficiency of maize by modulating antioxidant metabolism. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Nap. 48(2): 989-1004.
Al-Naggar, A. M. M., R. M. Abd El-Salam, A. E. E. Badran. and M. A. El-Moghazi. 2017. Drought tolerance of five quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes and its association with other traits under moderate and severe drought stress. Asian J. Agric. Res. 3(3): 2456-2468.
Armin, M. and A. Keyvanlou. 2015. The effect of methanol foliar application on morphological characteristics of maize roots and shoots under drought stress. J. Crop Prod. Res. 7(1): 27-39. (Abstract in English)
Aytak, Z., N. Gulmezoglu, Z. Sirel. and I. Tolay. 2015. The effect of zinc on yield, yield components and micronutrient concentrations in the seeds of safflower genotypes (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Network Bit, Hortic. Agrol. 42(1): 202-208.
Bagheri, M. 2018. Quinoa agriculture manual, seed and plant breeding research institute publication. 47 p. (Abstract in English)
Bazile, D., C. Pulvento, A. Verniau, M. S. Al-Nusairi, D. Ba, J. Breidy. and S. Padulosi. 2016. Worldwide evaluations of quinoa: preliminary results from post international year of quinoa FAO projects in nine countries. Front Plant Sci. 7: 1-18.
Bindraban, P. S., C. O. Dimkpa. and R. Pandey. 2020. Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health. Biol. Fertil Soils. 56: 299–317.
Birami, H., M. Rahimian, M. Salehi, R. Yazdani Beyuki, M. Shiran Tafti. and M. Nikkhah. 2019. Effect of irrigation distance on yield and yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under saline conditions. J. Agri. Knowledge Sustain. Prod. (Agricultural Knowledge). 30(3): 357-347. (Abstract in English)
Bhargava, A. S. R. S. Shukla, Katiyar. and D. Ohri. 2003. Selection parameters for genetic improvement in Chenopodium grain on sodic soil. J. Appl. Hortic. 5: 45-48.
Ganjali, A., M. Kafi. and M. Sabet Teymouri. 2010. Changes in physiological indices of roots and shoots of chickpea (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in response to drought stress. J. Environ. Stresses Crop Sci. 3(1): 45-35. (Abstract in English)
Garcia, M., B. Condori and C. D. Castillo. 2015. Agroecological and agronomic cultural practices of quinoa in South America. Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production: 25-46.
Goma, E. F. 2013. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and biofertilizers on Quinoa plant, J Appl. Sci. Res. 9(8): 5210-5222.
Hawkesford, M., W. Horst, T. Kichey, H. Lambers, J. Schjoerring, I. Skrumsager Moller, P. and White. 2012. Functions of macronutrients. In: Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants (Ed. Marschner, P.). 135-189.
Hosseinzadeh, S. R., A. Salimi. and A. Ganjali, 2013. The effect of methanol application on some characteristics related to the growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) roots under drought stress. J. Crop Physiol. 5(17): 5-16. (Abstract in English)
Jorfi, A., M. Alavifazel, A. Gilani M. R. Ardakani. and Sh. Lak. 2022a. Yield and morpho-physiological performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes as affected by phosphorus and zinc. J. Plant Nutr. 46 (16): 2432- 2446.
Jorfi, A., M. Alavifazel, A. Gilani M. R. Ardakani. and Sh. Lak. 2022b. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) root system development as affected by phosphorus and zinc sulfate application in an alkaline soil. Gesunde Pflanzen.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00740-0.
Khavarinejad, R. F., F. Najafi. and R. Firozeh. 2011. Effect of zinc sulphate on physiological parameters on bean crop. Crop Sci. Res. 21(1): 1-14. (Abstract in English)
Khoshkam, S. 2017. Introducing a new quinoa plant for cultivation in the south of Kerman province. Promotional publication of the Center for Research and Education of Agriculture and Natural Resources in the South of Kerman Province. 19 pages.
Liu, H., W. Gan, Z. Rengel. and P. Zhao. 2016. Effects of zinc fertilizer rate and application method on photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of summer maize. J. soil Sci. plant Nutr. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162016005000045.
Mansouri, M., M. Alavifazel, A, Gilani, Sh. Lak. and M. Mojddam. 2021. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on efficiency and remobilization in quinoa cultivars. Ann di Bot. 11: 155–170.
Malinowska, E. K. Jankowski, B. Wisniewska-Kadżajan, J. Sosnowski, R. Kolczarek, J. Jolanta Jankowska, A. Grazyna. and G. Ciepiela. 2015. Content of zinc and copper in selected plants growing along a motorway. Bulletin Environ. Contamination Toxicol. 95: 638-643.
Miransari, H. A. Mehr Afarin. and H. Naghdi Badi. 2015. Morphophysiological and phytochemical responses of dill (Anethum graveolens L.) to foliar application of iron sulfate and zinc sulfate. J. Medic Plants. 14(54): 15-29. (Abstract in English)
Mostafavi Rad, M., A. Nobahar. and A. Mehboob Khammami. 2018. Nutrition management in canola cultivation. Publication of the research and education center of agriculture and natural resources of Gilan province. 24 pages.
Mousavi, S., Gh. Mohammadi, R. Baradaran, M. J. Seghe Eslami. and A. Amiri. 2015. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on morphological traits, yield and yield components of three rice cultivars. Iranian J Crop Res. 13(1): 152-146. (Abstract in English)
Movlaei, A. and M. Bagheri. 2020. Yield comparison of quinoa genotype in shahre-kord. In: Proceeding of 16th National Congress of Agricultural Sciences and Plant Breeding of Iran. Shahre-Kord, Iran. 25-27. (Abstract in English)
Reddy, V. R. P., S. Das, H. K. Dikshit, G. P. Mishra, M. Aski, S. K. and T. R. Meena. 2020. Sharma, Genome-wide association analysis for phosphorus use efficiency traits in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) using genotyping by sequencing approach, Front Plant Sci. 11: 1-18.
Sarani, S. S. and Gh. Mousavi. 2016. Effect of plant density and duration of weed interference period on grain sorghum yield and yield components. J. Plant Prot. 31 (3): 518-526. (Abstract in English)
Salehi, M. and F. Dehghani. 2018. Guide to planting, growing and harvesting quinoa in saline conditions. Publication of Agricultural Education. 96 pages.
Shirin Nejad, R. and F. Torabi Mahmoudi. 2019. Evaluation of compatibility of quinoa cultivars in different planting dates and their effect on morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters. 2nd Intl. Conf. 6th Natl. Conf. Against Conventional Agri. 1-7. (Abstract in English)
Slovak, R., T. Ogura, S. B. Satbhai, D. Ristova. and W. Busch. 2015. Genetic control of root growth: from genes to networks. Ann Bot. 117(1): 9–24.
Vance, C. P., C. Uhde-Stone. and D. L. Allan. 2003. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol. 157: 423-457.
Yang, Q., G. Lin. and H. Lv. 2021. Environmental and genetic regulation of plant height in Soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 21: 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02836-7.
Ziaei, S.M.M., K. Salimi. and S. R. Amiri. 2020. Investigation of quinoa cultivation (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under different irrigation intervals and foliar application in saravan region. Crop Physiol J. 45(12): 113-125. (Abstract in English)
