طراحی و اعتبار سنجی الگوی شایستگی های حرفه‌ای اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش
محمد جاودانی
1
(عضو هیئت علمی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان)
ژیلا حیدری
2
(عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان)
عباس اناری نژاد
3
(هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان)
کلید واژه: طراحی الگو, دانشگاه فرهنگیان, اعتبارسنجی الگو, شایستگی‌های حرفه‌ای, هیات علمی,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی شایستگی‌های حرفه‌ای اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان انجام شد. این پژوهش از نوع توسعه‌ای-کاربردی است که به روش ترکیبی از نوع اکتشافی متوالی انجام شد. دانشجویان، اعضای هیات علمی و کارشناسان آموزش دانشگاه فرهنگیان فارس به عنوان جامعه آماری بخش کیفی به شمار می‌روند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و تکنیک اشباع نظری، 60 نفر (15نفر عضو هیات علمی، 15نفر کارشناس آموزش و30نفر دانشجو(15 دختر و 15 پسر)) انتخاب شدند. در بخش کمی نیز اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان کشور به عنوان جامعه آماری بودند که 150نفر به شیوه تصادفی انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی از مصاحبه نیمه ساختمند و بررسی اسناد، و در بخش کمی از پرسش‌نامه محقق‌ساخته استفاده شد. برای تحلیل داده‌های کیفی، از روش تحلیل مضمون و برای تحلیل داده‌های کمی از تحلیل عامل و ضریب آلفای کرنباخ استفاده شد. با استفاده از معیارهای اعتبارسنجی کیفی چارچوب اولیه اعتبارسنجی گردید. برای اعتبارسنجی کمی از تحلیل عامل و ضریب آلفای کرنباخ استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که الگوی شایستگی‌های حرفه‌ای اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان متشکل3 عامل(1-دانش حرفه ای2-مهارت‌های حرفه‌ای3-اخلاق حرفه‌ای )،11ملاک(1-دانش محتوا2-دانش آموزش محتوا3-دانش پژوهشی4-دانش سازمانی5-دانش فناوری6-مهارت تدریس7-مهارت پژوهش8-مهارت فناوری9-مهارت‌های ارتباطی10-اخلاق فردی 11- اخلاق سازمانی) و 62 نشانگر است.این الگو می‌تواند به عنوان چارچوب و مبنایی برای جذب، توسعه‌ی حرفه‌ای و ارزیابی شایستگی‌های حرفه‌ای اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان کشور مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
The purpose of this study was to design and validate the model of professional competencies of faculty members at Farhangian University.This applied - developmental research was conducted using a sequential exploratory mixed method. The statistical population of the qualitative section includes students, faculty and education experts of Fars Farhangian University.Using purposeful sampling and theoretical saturation technique, 60 members (15 faculty members, 15 education experts and 30 students :15 girls and 15 boys) were selected.In the quantitative section, the faculty members of Farhangian University were the statistical population of which 150 were randomly selected. Semi-structured interviews and document review were used for data collection in the qualitative section, and a researcher-made questionnaire was used for quantitative data. Thematic analysis method was used for qualitative data analysis and factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used for quantitative data analysis. The initial framework was validated using qualitative criteria.The results showed that the model of the professional competencies of the faculty members of Farhangian University consisted of 3 factors 1) professional knowledge 2) professional skills 3) professional ethics and 11 criteria 1). Content knowledge. 2). Pedagogical conent knowledge,. 3). Knowledge of research. 4). Organizational knowledge. 5). Knowledge of technology. 6). Teaching skill. 7). Research skill. 8). Technology skills. 9). Communication skills. 10). Individual ethics. 11). Organizational ethics and 62 indicators. This model can be used as a framework for recruitment, professional development and evaluation of faculty members of Farhangian University.
Abedini, S. et al. (2010). Perspectives of Medical Students Regarding Criteria for a Good Univertsity Professor in Bandar Abbas, Iran. Hormozgan Medical Journal, 3, 241-245.
Akhavan Kazemi, M. (2005). Sustainable political development and higher education. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 1 (1), 13-32.[in Persian]
Almasi, H; Zarei Zawarki, I; Nili, M. R and Delavare, A. (2017). Evaluation of Fourth Internship Curriculum in Farhangian University Based on Tyler-goal orinted Evaluation Model, Journal of lesson study, 1 (5), 1-24. [in Persian]
Al-Zoubi, Zohair H.& Mahasneh, Ahmad M. (2013).The University Professor: The Attributes & Characteristics as Seen by the Hashemite University Students. Asian Social Science, 9 (13),20-25
Association of Teacher Educators. (2006). Standards for teacher educators. RetrievedDecember15,2005,fromhttp://www.ate1.org/pubs/StandardsforTeac. fm
Australian Institute for Training and School Leadership. (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved March 25, 2011, from:http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/AITSL National Professional Standards for Teachers.pdf
Bain, K. (2004). What the Best College Professor Do? Harvard University Press.
Bates, A., Ramirez, L., & Drits, D. (2009). Connecting university supervision and critical reflection: Mentoring and modeling. The Teacher Educator, 44(2), 90-112.
Bennett, P. N. et al. (2002). “Job Satisfaction of Agriculture Teacher in Georgia and Selected Variables Indicating their Risk of Leaving the Teaching Profession”; Paper Presented at the Southern Agricultural Education Research Conference, Orlando, pp. 555 - 567.
Bonakadari, N; Mehran, G; Mahroozadeh, G and Hashemi, S. A. (2016). Qualities of qualitative faculty member in Iran Higher Education: a Qualitative Study, Journal of Research in New Approach in Educational Management, 7 (3), 117-138. [in Persian]
Bridges, D. (1999). Teacher education and training: The location of professionality. Paper presented at the The 3rd Intenational Conference on Teacher Education,Beit-Berl College, Israel.
Buller, J. L. (2010). Essential College Professor: A Practical Guide to an Academic Career 1st Edition. San Francisco:CA Jossey-Bass.
Ciancialow, H. (2007). The comparative students of college in the teacher characteristics. Journal of Psychology, 69, 32-33.
Clarmin, B. (2008). Students’ opinion of master desirable characteristics. Journal of Social Psychology, 71, 29.
Cordinals, K. (2007). The master typical characteristic. The Journal of Psychoeducational, 33, 25.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Dargahi, H; Hamuzadeh, P; Sadeghifar, J; RadAbadi; M; Rowshani; M; Salimi; M and Soltanzadeh; P. (2010). Assessing the Criteria of a Capable faculty member for Effective Teaching from the views of Paramedical Students of Tehran Medical Sciences University, Journal of , Paramedical collage of Tehran Medical Sciences University (Payavard Salamat), 4 (3 & 4), 91-98. [in Persian]
Dengerink, J., Lunenberg, M. and Kools, Q. )2015(. What and how teacher educators prefer to learn. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 41(1), 78–96.
Erdem, M. (2008). Quality of work life and its relation to organizational commitment according to teachers in public and private secondary schools. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Ankara:Ankara University Educational Science Faculty.
Frally, A. (2006). The survey manager aptitude about teacher characteristics. Journal of Psychology, 65, 23-24.
Ghadami, A., Salehi, B ., Sajadi, SH & Naji, H.(2007). “Students Points of View Regarding Effective Factors in Establishing Communication between Students and Faculty members”. Iranian journal of medical Education, 7(17), 154-149.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, reimagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2),273-289.
Hyatt. L, Williams. P. E. (2011). 21st Century Competencies for Doctoral Leadership. Faculty.Innov High Educ, 36: 53- 66.
Ingersol, R. M. (2008). The teacher quality problem. M. S. Cochran-Smith (Ed), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts içinde. New York, NJ: Routledge,
Kiumarsi, F; Kamkari, K and Shokrzadeh, Sh. (2009). Desirable Features of faculty members of Islamic Azad University, Eslamshahr Branch, Students' View, journal of new Thoughts in Educational Sciences, 3 (15), 83-102. [in Persian]
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J. & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1020-1041.
Koster, Bob., Brekelmans, Mieke., Korthagen, Fred & Wubbels, Theo.(2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 157–176
Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. Second Edition. Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J. & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Roles, behaviour, and professional development of teacher educators.Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Loughran, J.(2014). Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator. Journal of Teacher Education1–13. Journal of Teacher Education published online 28 April 2014 http://jte.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/28/0022487114533386. The online version of this article can be found at: http://jte.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/28/0022487114533386
Markes, A. (2006). Identifying master characteristic: The Journal of Psychology, 78, 22-24.
Mazlomi Mohammad Abadi, S. S; Rahani, Z; Ehramposh, M. H and Soltani, T (2010). Features of a capable Teacher from Students' Viewpoints of yazd Shahid Sadoughi Medical Sciences University. Hormozgan Medical Journal, 3 (14), 226-233. [in Persian]
Örnek-Büken, N. (2006). Türkiye örneğinde akademik dünya ve akademik etik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 164-170.
Namdari Pejman, M; Mirkamali, S. M; Pourkarimi, J and Farsatkhah, M. (2018). Phenomenological analysis on the understanding of the quality assurance of teaching and preparing teacher students. Journal of research on teacher education , 1 (3), 197-225. [in Persian]
Namdari Pejman, M; Ali Mohammadi, M; Mousavi, S. F and Nahanji, F (2018). Job Description of Farhangian University Faculty Members: A Survey on the Analysis of the Content of Supplementary Documents, Research Project, Tehran: Farhangian University.
Osinski, I. C., & Hernández. M. (2013). Study of the qualities of a good university lecturer of health sciences. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 342 – 350
Richardson, K. (2008). The standpoint collegian aground master characteristics. The Journal of Curriculum, 26, 39-40.
Salimi, Gh; Shafiei, M; Keshavarz, F and Heidari, E (2017). Evaluating the competencies of technical &Enginiering faculty members for realizing mission of the university in the 1404 horizon: Position of teaching competencies from the viwes of PhD students. Journal of Curriculum Research, Iran Curriculum Studies Association, 7 (2), 43-66. [in Persian]
Shagrir, L. (2010). Professional development of novice teacher educators: Professional self, interpersonal relations and teaching skills. In T. Bates, A. Swennen & K. Jones (Eds.), The professional development of teacher educators (pp. 55-70). London: Taylor & Francis.
Shagrir, L., & Altan, M. (2014). The expert teacher educator: Characteristics and professional identity. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development 5(1), 41-50
Sharif Nia, S. H, Ebadi, A and Hekmat Afshar, M. (2013). Good Professor Features from Nursing Students and Professors' Viewpoints: A Qualitative Study, journal of Nasim tandorosti, 2 (1), 1-10. [in Persian]
Silberstein, M. (1993). Guidelines of the program for pedagogical instructors as experts. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute.
Stronge, James H.(2007). Qualities of effective teachers .2nd ed. Alexandria, Virginia USA: ASCD.
Swennen, A., and M. van der Klink, eds. (2009). Becoming a teacher educator. Theory and practice for teacher educators. Dordrecht: Springer.
Terpstra, D. E., & Honoree, A. L. (2009). The effects of different teaching, research, and service emphases on individual and organizational outcomes in higher education institutions. Journal of Education for Business, 84(3), 169-176.
Tunca, Nihal., Şahin, Senar Alkın., Oğuz, Aytunga., Güner, Halime Özge
Bahar.(2015). Qualities of Ideal Teacher Educators.Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2),122-145.
Willemse, T.M. and Boei, F. ( 2013). Teacher educators’ research practices: an explorative study of teacher educators’ perceptions on research. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 39 (4), 354–369.
Yıldırım, A. (2013). Teacher education research in Turkey: Trends, issues and priority areas. Education and Science, 38(169), 175-191.
Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education.
Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382.
_||_