ارزیابی بازدهی نسبت به مقیاس در واحدهای منتخب دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد کار و جمعیت
1 - مربی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد فیروزکوه
کلید واژه: آموزش عالی, دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی, تابع هزینه ترانسلوگ, صرفههای ناشی از مقیاس, اندازه بهینه,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این مقاله بررسی نوع بازده نسبت به مقیاس وصرفههای ناشی از مقیاس در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، با استفاده از تابع هزینه ترانسلوگ طی دوره 84 – 1379می باشد. نتایج نشان میدهد واحدهای مورد بررسی بطور میانگین در ارائه خدمات آموزشی در سطح کاردانی - کارشناسی در حالت بازده کاهنده و عدم صرفههای ناشی از مقیاس و در سطح کارشناسی ارشد - دکتری در حالت بازده فزاینده و وجود صرفههای ناشی از مقیاس قرار دارند. همچنین تعداد بهینه دانشجو در سطح کاردانی وکارشناسی 9000-7000 نفر، دانشجو در سطح کارشناسی ارشد ودکتری 1000-800 دانشجو میباشد.
This paper investigates the economies of scale of higher education in Islamic Azad University. We use the long-run Translog multi product cost function and estimate, respected to the homogeneity and symmetry restrictions, to use Systematic Iterative Seemingly Unrelated Regression (ISUR). The data will be collected from 29 selected branches of Islamic Azad University during 2000-2005.Results indicate diseconomies of scale in level of undergraduate education and economies of scale in level of postgraduate education and an optimal number of students for undergraduate education is 7000 to 9000 and for postgraduate education is 800 to 1000.
منابع:
- Andrew, L.D., & Friedman, B.D. (1976). A study of the causes for the Demise of certain small, private Liberal Arts colleges in the U.S.A.Blacksburg: Virginia polytechnic iinstitute & state university).
- Chau, T. N. (1972). The cost of introducing a reform in primary education. Educational cost analysis in action: case studies for planner. Paris, int’l institute for educational Planning.
- Cohn, E. (1968). Economies of scale in Iowa high school operations. j. of human resources 3(4): 422-34.
- Eicher, J. C., & F. Orivel (1980). Cost analysis of primary education by television in the Ivory Coast. The economics of new educational Media. Paris, UNESCO.
- Johnes, J. (1995). unit costs: some explanations of differences between UK universities, applied economics, 22:853-62
- Layard, P. R. G & Verry, D. W. (1975), Cost functions for university teaching and research, Economic Journal, 85: 55-74
- Lee, K. H. (1985). Further evidence on economies of scale in higher education Comparative Education Rev.
- Osborne, M. J. (1989). On the Marginal cost of a student in the public sector of higher education in the UK, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 13: 55-065.
- Panzer, J.C. & Willing, R.D. (1981), Economics of scope, American Journal Of Political Economy, 76:678-711.
- Psacharopoulos, G. (1982).The Economics of higher education in developing countries. Comparative Education Rev. 26(2).
- Psacharopoulos, G. (1991). Higher education in developing countries: the scenario of the future. Higher education 21(1): 3-10.
- Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: a global update. World development 22(9): 1325-43.
- Psacharopoulos, G., & G. Williams (1973). Public Sector Earning and Educational Planning. Int’l labour review (July): 43-57.
- Psacharopoulos, G., & W. Loxley (1985). Diversified Secondary Education and Development: Evidence from Colombia and Tanzania. Baltimore, Md., Johns Hopkins UN. Press.
- Riew, O. (1966). Economies of scale in high school operation. Rev. of Economics and Statistics 48(3): 280-87.
- Rosen, S. (1987). Human capital, the new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics J. Eatwell and ET. Al. London, Macmillan Press, Ltd: 682-690.
- Truett, L. J. (2002), A cost function analysis of import demand and growth in South Africa, Journal of Development Economics, 70: 425-442.
- Walsh, J. R. (1935). Capital concept applied to man. Quarterly j. of economics xlix (February): 255-85.
- World Bank (1986), China: management and finance of higher education, washington, d.c: world bank, report by r. drysdale, w. hiddleton and W. pierpont