چکیدههدف از این پژوهش، بررسی نقش میانجی فرصت‌های رشد بر رابطه میان فرا اطمینانی مدیران و کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری است. با توجه به اینکه سرمایه‌گذاری فرآیند اتخاذ تصمیمی است که مدیران از آن برای شناسایی طرح‌هایی که بر ارزش شرکت می‌افزایند استفاده می‌کنند، حالات روانی مدیران از جمله فرا اطمینانی مدیران، نقش قابل ملاحظه‌ای در انتخاب پروژه‌های سرمایه‌گذاری دارند. از طرفی اثرگذاری فرا اطمینانی مدیران بر کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری می‌تواند از طریق فرصت‌های رشد به‌صورت غیرمستقیم صورت گیرد. این پژوهش از نوع علّی، پس رویدادی و کاربردی است. جهت انجام این پژوهش، نمونه آماری شامل 156 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی دوره زمانی 1388 تا 1397 انتخاب گردید. بر اساس روش داده‌های ترکیبی و تجزیه‌وتحلیل رگرسیون خطی چند متغیره و لجستیک، یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که فرا اطمینانی مدیران منجر به افزایش/کاهش سرمایه‌گذاری بیش از حد/کمتر از حد شرکت‌ها می‌شود. همچنین براساس روش بارون و کنی (1986) فرا اطمینانی مدیران نه تنها به صورت مستقیم بلکه به طور غیر مستقیم و از طریق فرصت‌های رشد (میانجی‌گیری کامل) بر کارایی سرمایه‌گذاری اثر گذار می‌باشد. پرونده مقاله

Spiritual and emotional intelligence in the field of organizational behavior is very important for the performance of companies, concurrent with stock prices, and the expected return of investors. Managers with these two skills have a remarkable ability to create commitment in employees, strengthen the spirit of self-control in employees and eliminate weaknesses in the control of the company. Is their spirituality and affects the effectiveness of the company. Therefore, based on this argument, the present study examines the effect of managers' spiritual and emotional intelligence on the concurrence of stock prices and stock returns. For this purpose, King (2008) questionnaire and emotional intelligence based on Bar-On (2001) questionnaire were used to measure the spiritual intelligence of managers. The hypotheses were tested using the statistical method of regression analysis with composite data using the information of 60 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange in 2019. The findings of the research hypothesis indicate that the emotional and spiritual intelligence of managers affects the concurrence of companies' stock prices. The results also include the effect of managers 'emotional and spiritual intelligence on companies' stock returns. پرونده مقاله

Given the existing economic situation, the role of management accounting in Iranian economic enterprises has been quite evident in the last two decades. Considering the economic crises, it is necessary to examine the indicators of adoption of management accounting innovations in times of economic crisis. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the indicators of adoption of management accounting innovations in times of economic crisis and to present a model for its structural equations. The research was conducted in two parts: qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, data analysis was performed by Delphi method and using interviews with 10 experts, including managers and deputies of the management accounting department of accepted companies and university professors. The analysis was conducted three parts: open coding, axial coding and selective coding and finally Delphi method. Based on the results obtained in the qualitative section, 103 sub-components and 6 main components were identified. The main components are: 1) economic crises; 2) economic indicators; 3) organizational culture; 4) information and communication technology; 5) Management indicators and 6) Crisis control indicators. In the quantitative section, using the indicators identified in the qualitative section, a questionnaire was designed and provided to a statistical sample including 180 people, managers and deputies of the management accounting department. Finally, the questionnaires were analyzed by PLS structural equation modelling. The results showed that economic indicators ,organizational culture, information and communication technology , and crisis control indicators as indicators of adoption of management accounting innovations in times of crisis. پرونده مقاله

Interpretive structural modeling is a method for designing systems, especially accounting and management systems. This approach was first introduced by Warfield and has recently been frequently used by researchers in studies for modeling the relationships between variables. This approach makes it possible for the researcher to illustrate the complex relationships between the variables in a rather complex circumstance. It is now considered to be an important tool for organizing and directing the complexity of the relationships between variables. At first, this technique identifies the variables and then specifies the contextual relationships between the variables using the knowledge of experts and their experiences, and finally, it creates a multi-layered structural model. The present study is an applied research of the mixed type in terms of its purpose. In this study, the aforementioned technique was used to structure the factors explaining the causes of business failure (bankruptcy) of agricultural firms in the Tehran Stock Exchange. For this purpose, experts in this field (auditing-financial managers) in the agricultural firms accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. In addition, 12 variables of audit report disclosures were identified as factors explaining the business failure. Then, the rate of effectiveness of these variables on one another in the model explaining business failure was coded using the initial access matrix. Finally, they were leveled using the final matrix. The results of interpretive structural modeling showed that the factors explaining business failure were modeled at six levels, with the type of auditing opinion at the highest level and had a greater impact on other factors. The highest degree of effectiveness was associated with other disclosures related to environmental-economic-regulatory factors which were at the lower levels. Therefore, it can be claimed that the disclosures associated with environmental-economic-regulatory factors explained the causes of business failure better than other audit variables. پرونده مقاله