مدل خردمندی: نقش ویژگی های شخصیتی، هوش موفق با واسطه گری صبر و خودکارآمدی
محورهای موضوعی : روان درمانگریرقیه قربانی 1 , فرهاد خرمائی 2 , حمیده قاسمی 3
1 - استادیار دانشگاه فرهنگیان یزد
2 - دانشیار دانشگاه شیراز
3 - دکتری روان شناسی
دانشگاه اهواز
کلید واژه: خردمندی, هوش موفق, خودکارآمدی مقابله, صبر, شخصیت,
چکیده مقاله :
هــدف از ایــن پژوهــش آزمــون مــدل علــی بــرای تبییــن رفتــار خردمنــدی دانشــجویان بــود. ۴۴۰ دانشــجوی کارشناســی (۲۸۱ زن، ۱۵۹ مــرد) بــا روش نمونه‌بـرداری تصادفـی خوشـه‌ای چندمرحلـه‌ای از بیـن دانشـجویان دانشـکده‌های دانشـگاه شـیراز در سـال تحصیلـی ۹۸-۹۹ انتخـاب شـدند و مقیاس‌هـای خودسـنجی خردمنـدی (ویسـتر، ۲۰۰۳)، فـرم کوتـاه پنـج عامـل بـزرگ شـخصیت (خرمایٔـی و فرمانـی، ۲۰۱۴)، هـوش موفـق (اسـترنبرگ و گریگورنکـو، ۲۰۰۲)، صبـر (خرمایٔـی، فرمانـی و سـلطانی، ۲۰۱۵) و خودکارآمـدی مقابلـه (چسـنی نیلنـدز، چمبـرس، تیلـور و فولکمـن، ۲۰۰۶) را تکمیـل کردنـد. نتایـج نشـان داد توافق‌جویـی، وظیفه‌شناسـی، روان‌آزردگـی و هـوش موفـق بـه صـورت غیرمسـتقیم بـا واسـطه‌گری (صبـر و خودکارآمـدی مقابلـه) قـادر بـه پیش‌بینـی خردمنـدی هسـتند و ۴۵درصـد از واریانـس خردمنـدی را ایـن متغیرهـا تبییـن می‌کنـد. بـر اسـاس یافته‌هـای ایـن پژوهـش می‌تـوان نتیجـه گرفـت رگه‌هـای شـخصیت و هـوش موفـق، باعـث صبـر دانشـجویان و خودکارآمدتـر شـدن آنهـا را در مقابلـه بـا مشـکلات افزایـش می‌دهـد و درنتیجـه، ایـن افـراد در مسـیر خردمندتـر شـدن پیـش می‌رونـد.
The purpose of this research was to introduce and test a causal model of investigating wisdom behaviors. 440 undergraduate (281 women, 159 men) were selected by random cluster sampling method in Shiraz University in academic year 98-99. They completed Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (Webster, 2003), NEO Questionnaire Short Form (Khormaei & Farmani, 2014), Successful Intelligence Scale (Sternberg & Grigorenko, 2002), Patience Scale (Khormaei, Farmani & Soltani, 2015), and Coping Self-efficacy (Chesney, Neilands, Chambers, Taylor & Folkman, 2006). The result of the present study supported the med- itational effect of patience and coping self- efficacy. In this regards, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and successful intelligence predicted wisdom indirectly by the mediation role of patience and coping self-efficacy. Accordingly, 45% of the wisdom variance were explained by these variables. Therefore, the big factor personality dimensions and successful intelligence increasepa- tience. So students who are patience to face the problems have more coping self-efficacy skills than those who are not patience; and finally result, they would behave wisely.
Ardelt, M. (2011). Wisdom, age, and well-being. In K.W. Schaie & S. L.Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 235-247). AP: Academic Press.
Ardelt, M., Pridgen, S., & Nutter-Pridgen, K. L. (2018). The relation between age and three-dimensional wisdom: Variations by wisdom dimensions and education. Journal of Gerontology, 73(8), 1339- .1349
Asadi, S. (2015). Charecteristic of wisdom base on implicit theories. Journal of Positive Psychological, 1(1), 51-66. [In Persian].
Azadmanesh, M., Abolmaali, KH., & Mohamadi, A. (2020). The structural relationship between wisdom and moral behavior: The mediating role of self- control. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 16(63), 221-231. [In Persian].
Bahramiyan, F., Morovati, Z., Yousefi, M., & Amiri, M. (2015). Reliability, validity, and factorial analysis of Coping Self-efficacy Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality, 15 (20), 215 - 226. [In Persian].
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to rchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55 .122-136 ,)1(
Baltes, P. B. (2004). Wisdom: The orchestration of mind and virtue. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human
Development.
Bluck, S., & Gluck, J. (2004). Making things better and learning a lesson: Experiencing wisdom across the life span. Personality, 72 (3), 543-572.
Bluck, S., & Gluck, J. (2005). From the inside out: People’s implicit theories of wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (2005), A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 84-109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, S. (2004). Learning across the campus: How college facilitates the development of wisdom. College Student Development, 45 (2), 134-148.
Chan, D. W. (2008). Teacher self‐efficacy and successful intelligence among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong. Experimental Educational Psychology, 28, 735-746.
Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B., Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale. British Health Psychology, 11, 421- 437.
Dortaj, F., Kord Noghabi, R., Ferrari, M., Jahan, F., & Esmaeili, S.(2018). Investiting validity and reliability and factor analysis of Webster’s Wisdom Questionnaire in Iran. Learning and Memory, 1, 7 .17 –
Ellemers, N., van der Toorn, J., Paunov, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published
from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), 332-366.
Fengyan, W., & Hong, Z. (2012). A new Theory of Wisdom: Integrating intelligence and morality. Psychology Research, 2 (1), 64-75.
Ghorbani, R., & Khormaee, F. (2016). Explaining wisdom on the basis of successful intelligence and coping self efficacy. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists), 13(49), 43-55. [In Persian].
Gilmore, A. L. (2014). A cultural examination of hardiness: Associations with self-esteem, wisdom, hope, and coping-efficacy. PhD Dissertation, Georgia Southern University.
Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., & Straber, I. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Personaliy Science and Indiviual Differences, 4 (405), 2-13.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public- domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models.Personality, 7, 1- 28.
Greene, J. A., & Brown, S. C. (2009). The Wisdom Development Scale: Further validity investigations. International Aging & Human Development, 68 (4), .289-320
Grossmann, I., Sahdra, B. K., & Ciarrochi, J.(2016). A heart and a mind: Selfdistancing facilitates the association between heart rate variability, and wise reasoning. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10 .1-10 ,)68(
Igarashi, H., Levenson, M. R., & Aldwin, C. M (2018). The development of wisdom: Asocial ecological approach. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 73 (8), 1350-1358.
Khormaei, F., A., Farmani, A., & Sultani, E. (2015). The Patience Scale: Instrument development and estimates of psychometric properties. Journal of Educucation Measurement, 5(17), 50-67. [In Persian].
Khormaei, F., & Farmani, A. (2014). Investigation 360 psychometric characteristics short form Big
Five Personality. Journal of Psychological Models Methods, 4(16), 29-32. [In Persian].
Negahban Salami, M., Farzad, V., & Sarami, Gh. (2014). A study of factor structure, reliability and validity of the successful intelligence scale. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15(15), 1-16. [In Persian].
Kalyar, M. N., & Kalyar, H. (2018). Provocateurs of creative performance: Examining the roles of wisdom character strengths and stress. Personnel Review, 47(2), 334-352.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd Ed), New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2015). Virtues, practical wisdom and psychological well-being: a Christian perspective. Springer Science Business Media Dordrecht, 123 (3), 735-755.
Kunzmann, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). The psychology of wisdom: Theoretical and empirical challenges. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (Eds.), Ahandbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives, (pp.110 - 135). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Wisdom as integrated thought: Historical and developmental perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development, (pp.52-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Latvia, R. (2013). Factors of resilience wisdom and self efficacy as positive resources of leaders in sample of Latvian. Problem Psychology, 5, 96-107.
Le, T. N. (2011). Cultural values, life experiences, and wisdom. Aging and Human Development, 66 (4), .259-281
Le, T., & Levenson, M. (2005). Wisdom as self- transcendence: What’s love and individualism got to do with it? Research in Personality, 39 (4), 443- 457.
Lecturer, S. R. (2009). Five factors of personality and wisdom. Progressive Education, 2, 82-86.
Mitana, J. M.V., Muwagga, A. M., & Sempala, C. (2019). Assessment for successful ıntellıgence: A paradigm shift in classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(1), 106-115.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139-153). New York: Guilford Press.
McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. (2009). Religion, self–regulation and self control: Associations, explanations and implications. Psychologyical Bulliten, .69-93 ,)1( 134
Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. E. (2006). Practice wisdom: Aristotle meets positive psychology. Happiness Studies, 7, 377-395.
Shahsavarani, A. M., Hakimi, K, M., Alirezaloo, N., & Sattari, K. (2015). Teaching for wisdom as a strategy to improve quality of life and aggregate social capital. Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 5(9S) 143-149.
Staudinger, U. M., & Pasupathi, M. (2003). Correlates of wisdom-related performance in adolescence and adulthood: Age-graded differences in adolescence and adulthood in paths toward desirable development. Research on Adolescence, 13, 239-268.
Staudinger, U. M., & Gluck, J. (2011). Intelligence and wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 827-846). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Staudinger, U. M. (2001). Life reflection: A social- cognitive analysis of life review. Review of General Psychology Special Issue: Autobiographical Memory, .148-160 ,5
Staudinger, U. M., Dorner, J., & Mickler, C. (2005). Wisdom and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (Eds.), wisdom: Psychological perspectives (pp. 191-
220). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Sternberg, R. J. (1998).A balance theory of wisdom.
Review of General Psychology, 2, 347-365.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). The WICS approach to leadership: Stories of leadership and the structures and processes that support them. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 360 - 371.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tamara, L. G., & Bennett, E. P. (2015). Big five personality and academic dishonesty: A metaanalytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 59-67.
Walsh, R., & Reams, J. (2015). Studies of wisdom: A special issue of integral review. Integral Rewiew, .1-6 ,)2(11
Webster, J. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. Aging and Human, 65, 163-183.
Webster, J. (2010). Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 70- 80.
Weststrate, N. M., & Glück, J. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: Exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom.Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 800-814.
Williams, P. B. (2016). The relationship between mental and somatic practices and wisdom. Peer Reviewed Journal, 11(2), 1-14.
Yang, S. (2011). Wisdom displayed through leadership: Exploring leadership-related wisdom .The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 616-63.
